Archive for the ‘Science & Music’ Category

Science and music everywhere…

Wednesday, January 21st, 2009

These things have a slow start, and I am probably the first to blame for this. There are several reasons, one of which is that I am (I have to confess) a bit intimidated by the breadth of the subject. I am a musician, not a scientist, although I have a strong interest in that subject. Being an amateur astronomer, it is impossible to ignore the concept of the “Music of the Spheres”, and all the extrapolations we can make at the wave level. A wave is an orb or orbit, and an orbit is a wave, and the two are completely interchangeable. So I will soldier on.

About the music of the spheres, I have a small thought experiment which to me, epitomizes one side of this relationship. Look at the relationship between the three most influential celestial objects in our life: the Sun, the Earth and the Moon. Imagine the moon circling the earth in an almost perfect circle (all orbits in the solar system are ellipses, not perfect circles, but we will make them perfect for this experiment). The moon goes on and on around the earth; this is easy enough to imagine in your mind’s eye. Now imagine the earth itself orbiting around the sun . Just try to think what it does to the path of the moon when you put yourself on the sun (I did say it was a thought experiment!). The observer on the sun sees the moon weaving around the earth. There is no circle anymore, but a “sine wave”, the most pure (and boring) sound. Can you see it? if you can’t quite make it, drawing it it will make sense.

The thought experiment is one of the most productive techniques that physicists and mathematicians use to peer into new concepts. Einstein as a kid was imagining himself riding on a ray of light, asking himself what would the world look like to him from that vantage point.

Of course I am trying to find out what is a musical thought experiment; and it jumps to my mind that we are in a constant thought experiment. At least I am. I can think of two examples:

1. when composing, or actually even more when I am just thinking about new musical ideas; I am always putting them in this or that musical context. Different musical arrangements give me a different point of view, like being on the earth or the sun as in the previous thought experiment, rendering musical ideas almost as different as my perception of a circle or a sine wave.

2. when improvising, a different but related phenomena occur: time loses its grip and takes on a much more free and malleable form.

Now, to close this where I intended to start it. I am helping my wife promote her show which, how appropriate, is a multimedia performance about science and music in the 17th century. You’ll find out all about it here: http://galileosdaughters.com .In the process I did google the phrase ‘science and music’ together, and came across a lot of interesting stuff, and in the middle of it I found this page.

Be careful for what you wish for!

Welcome to this discussion

Tuesday, December 2nd, 2008

To every musician and scientist, this discussion is dedicated to you!

The links between science and music (and art to a wider extent) is by far not a new concept, you can actually hold an argument that they were united in most of their history, as science and art were both considered as philosophy. The root of the western scientific method can be traced to Aristotle who as he explored the physical world created the scientific method, which led him to study scales, modes and harmonic relationships, with the use of weights. from this it is not far to see the relationship: weight = mass = creative energy = emc2.

Yes, it is quite a short cut from one to the other; even absurd. But this kind of thinking is needed now, since the recent (about the past 100 years) trend is to compartmentalize the creative thinking process. But the history is on the other side. Besides Aristotle, Galileo’s father was a famous musician, Einstein played the violin and Richard Feyman played the bongos (quite well, I can attest, as a percussionist).

Another fascinating recent development, is the rise of techniques to study the brain. Neurology is opening a window in the process how music is understood by conscious and unconscious.

I think this is a fascinating subject, where there is still a lot of unknown that deserves to be explored. I also think that the answers can be explored by the people who are at the forefront of each discipline.

So please be open to offer your opinion and observations.

Marc Wagnon